Where did Liberals come from

John Locke, Rousseau and Voltaire

California is one of the most Liberal states in the union, and I was wondering where Liberalism came from. There are many sites on the internet so I chose this one to post.The above people above were instrumental in forming the party. Though there are others that helped it along. This is a small insert from http://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/1365/how-did-the-term-liberal-become-progressive.

American liberalism, the dominant Ideology of the Democratic Party, was formed from two strands:

Classical liberalism, the philosophy formed in the Enlightenment by thinkers like John Locke, Voltaire, and Rousseau, and providing the driving force for both the American Revolution and the French Revolution, which states that the autonomy of the individual should be maximized, and the individual should be freed from whatever institutions are preventing them from reaching their potential, be it the Church or the State.
Progressivism, a populist reform movement in the early twentieth century, espoused by Presidents like Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, and grounded in Protestant moralism, which sought to make government both more responsive to the plight of the people, for instance using Constitutional amendments to deal with social problems like alcoholism and using government force to quash monopolies, and at the same time more representative of the will of the electorate, for instance instituting more democracy like the direct election of Senators and ending the corruption of Machine politics in the cities.
These two strands were merged into the ideology we call American liberalism by John Dewey and his followers, who argued that we needed a broader conception of liberty than the one maintained by laissez-faire negative-rights libertarians. The key idea can be summed up in a quote from Anatole France: “In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets, and steal loaves of bread.” Basically, the idea is that the freedom to starve because you have no food is not a meaningful freedom at all, because it does not maximize your autonomy or allow your to realize your potential, which were important goals in classical liberalism.

Thus Dewey argued that we should recognize positive liberty as well as negative liberty, meaning that e.g. just as we ought to recognize a right to live without someone killing you, we similarly ought to recognize a right to live without dying due to lack of food. Thus American liberalism advocates that the government should play some role in the economy in order to give people autonomy and enable them to pursue their own happiness, along the lines of the “responsiveness” part of the Progressive philosophy. Thus Americans liberals still try to achieve the goals of classical liberalism, but they sometimes do it through Progressive means. (This is akin to how, as I discuss here, American conservatism tries to achieve the goals of traditionalism, but often through libertarian means.)

There’s one other way that American liberalism differs from classical liberalism: classical liberals took a deontological perspective on liberty, viewing personal autonomy and the pursuit of happiness as things that are inherently worthy of being promoted, regardless of what they lead to. American liberalism, on the other hand, because it emerged partly from Progressivism, tends to take a more utilitarian perspective on such things, viewing autonomy merely as a means to an end, the end being increasing the happiness of as many people as possible. The liberal understanding of utilitarianism is perhaps best understood through the work of John Rawls, who proposed a thought experiment along roughly these lines: suppose that you’re a soul waiting to be born, but you don’t know which body you’re going to be born into and what experiences that body is going to have. But before you’re born, you have the opportunity to design how society and government should be. How should you design it in order to maximize your chances of having a good life? Well, you don’t know what desires you’re going to have, but whatever they are, you’re probably going to want them fulfilled, so you would want a society that as much as possible allows people to pursue their own happiness. And you may end up being born in utter poverty that may prevent you from being happy, or you may start off being wealthy but then you may suffer calamities like disease and natural disasters, so assuming you’re risk averse (as humans tend to be in most circumstances), you’d want the government to have a safety net to shelter you from such risks. So that’s where the basic contours of the liberal position emerge.

Finally, let me mention something about foreign policy. The Progressive presidents advocated a very interventionist foreign policy, since they were motivated by the desire to help people as much as possible, even people abroad. Liberals still share some of this impulse, and are willing to support limited American military intervention in circumstances of extreme humanitarian crisis. But mostly their foreign policy views were taken from classical liberalism, so they they’re antiwar for the most part.

In any case, when contemporary liberals call themselves progressive, they’re hearkening back to their intellectual predecessors.

(I discuss the underpinnings of American conservatism here if you’re interested.)

EDIT: Yuval Levin has just written a book which argues that the positive rights vision of liberalism originated not with Dewey in the early twentieth century as I suggested, but rather in the late 1700’s with Thomas Paine, one of America’s founding fathers. Levin argues that the modern American left-right divide originated in the debate in America and England over the French Revolution. Paine was an enthusiastic supporter of the French Revolution, because he thought that government is an institution deliberately created by people to sageguard their individual liberty, and so it could be overthrown whenever the people thought it wasn’t doing a good job. On the other hand, Edmund Burke, a predecessor to modern conservatism, saw government as an institution that grew organically as a tradition, and that we should be suspicious of making changes to it just because individuals in the current generation happen to object to it. In any case, Paine’s philosophy of individualism led him to believe that an individual can only realize his full potential if he’s not constrained by material want, so he believed in the government providing basic necessities to everyone. Thus, Levin argues, the early twentieth century Progressive movement was merely reinventing the wheel.

My Thoughts

 

 

 

Throw the Stone

John 8:7King James Version (KJV)
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
My family and I have always been Democrats, Until the Party forgot why they were in office and started working for themselves instead of the people. I then switched to The Republican party. And to my dismay I found they were no different.
I have always said we need a Truck driver or laboror to rum for President. But instead we got Donald Trump.
He is a Billionair and isn’t living day by day as we are and in someways dissconected from us which turns a lot of perople away from .
Then I started to listen to him and behind all those comments that his opposition jumps on. I found a person that really wants to make our country great again, Believe me, it needs some changes because we are heading the the wrong way.
Think about it. The lord says if you are without sin throw the first stone. Well you tell me any person male or female that hasn’t looked at another person and hasn’t had a lewd thought at some time in their lives probably a lot of times.
Right now I am ashamed of McCain, Ryan, Rubio and the others who turn their backs on Trump. If they say they are Sin Free, they are liars, Plain and Simple. Maybe we should look at the real reason they are against him, Is it because they cannot control him?
John 8:7King James Version (KJV)
7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
My Thoughts

Who to Vote for

vote

 

 

Who should I Vote for?
Voting is getting closer, who do I vote for? My friends tell me who they think is the best candidate is, my Parents tell me what they think I should do. The media push a Candidate (They are bias) so what should I do?

The answer is actually pretty simple:
Keep a notebook or smart phone with you and ask everyone questions, ask about security, gun, control, economy, immigration and anything else you can think of. Then put a note down on your reaction to each question and see how you really feel about the answers you get. Then study each candidate and see how close they come to how you really feel about things.

 Remember, we all live with our actions, so make sure this is what you want.giphy
Then Vote!!

OPPOSE AB 450, AB 1664, AB 1673, AB 1674, AB 1695, and AB 2607.

These are gun laws going before Governor Brown today. It makes me mad but there is nothing I can do to stop him from passing them. Liberals outnumber us and don’t care if we call, write or email them they will not listen, they laugh at us and do whatever they want anyway. I applaud the NRA  and other gun rights groups for fighting the above, but we are out numbered.

My Thoughts

 


 

Stupid is as stupid does

> Have you heard of the Nuremberg Trials?
>
> 1 in 13 might say they have, but will not be able to tell
> you “what” was on trial (not who).
>
> Those same people will not be able to tell you the name of
> the Vice President.
>
> 84% of those who receive this will not read it completely,
> or at all.
>
> 10% will, but will also choose not to forward it.
>
> The remaining 6% will forward it.
>
> Stupid is as stupid does…
>
> The war started in the 7th century and lasted through the
> 17th century. I would contend it’s never stopped, but the
> facts below are historically correct.
>
> This is why I choke when I hear someone say we will defeat
> or contain these Islamic terrorists in a few years, or even
> 30 years, as recently stated by Leon Panetta.
>
> If the latest batch of murders, beheadings, and killing of
> innocent Christians has shocked you, maybe you should read
> this compilation of historical facts about the hatred of
> Muslims for all who are not Muslims.
>
> WE, …ARE THE STUPID
>
> This is factually (and historically) correct – and fully
> verifiable:
>
> In 732 A.D. the Muslim Army, which was moving on Paris, was
> defeated and turned back at Tours, France, by Charles
> Martell.
>
> In 1571 A.D. the Muslim Army/Navy was defeated by the
> Italians and Austrians as they tried to cross the
> Mediterranean to attack southern Europe in the Battle of
> Lepanto.
>
> In 1683 A.D. the Turkish Muslim Army, attacking Eastern
> Europe, was finally defeated in the Battle of Vienna by
> German and Polish Christian Armies.
>
> This crap has been going on for 1,400 years, and half of the
> politicians don’t even know it.
>
> If these battles had not been won, we might be speaking
> Arabic and Christianity could be non-existent; Judaism
> certainly would not exist.
>

> Reflecting: A lot of Americans have become so insulated from
> reality that they imagine that America can suffer defeat
> without any inconvenience to themselves. Pause a moment and
> reflect back.
>
> These events are actual events from history. They really
> happened! Do you remember?
>
> 47 years since 1968 …and this just keeps going on and on.
>
> 1. In 1968, Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by a Muslim
> male.
>
> 2. In 1972, at the Munich Olympics, Israeli athletes were
> kidnapped and massacred by Muslim males.
>
> 3. In 1972, a Pan Am 747 was hijacked and eventually
> diverted to Cairo where a fuse was lit on final approach.
> Shortly after landing it was blown up by Muslim males.
>
> 4. In 1973, a Pan Am 707 was destroyed in Rome, with 33
> people killed, when it was attacked with grenades by Muslim
> males.
>
> 5. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by Muslim
> males.
>
> 6. During the 1980’s a number of Americans were
> kidnapped in Lebanon by Muslim males.
>
> 7. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by
> Muslim males.
>
> 8. In 1985, the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a
> 70-year old American passenger was murdered and thrown
> overboard in his wheelchair by Muslim males.
>
> 9. In 1985, TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens , and a US
> Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by
> Muslim males.
>
> 10. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by Muslim males.
>
> 11. In 1993, the World Trade Center was bombed the first
> time by Muslim males.
>
> 12. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were
> bombed by Muslim males.
>
> 13. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used
> as missiles to take down the World Trade Centers and of the
> remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the
> other was diverted and crashed by the passengers. Thousands
> of people were killed by Muslim males.
>
> 14. In 2002, the United States fought a war in Afghanistan
> against Muslim males.
>
> 15. In 2002, reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and
> beheaded by – you guessed it – a Muslim male. (Plus two
> other American journalists who were just recently
> beheaded).
>
> 16. In 2013, the Boston Marathon bombing resulted in 4
> Innocent people, (including a child) being killed and 264
> people injured by Muslim males.
>
> No Obama, I really don’t see a pattern here to justify
> profiling, do you?  So, to ensure we Americans never
> offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on killing us,
> airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to
> profile certain people.
>
> So, ask yourself “Just how stupid are we???”
>
> Absolutely No Profiling! They must conduct random searches
> of 80-year-old women, little kids, airline pilots with
> proper identification, secret agents who are members of the
> Obama’s security detail, 85-year-old Congressmen with
> metal hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor
> Joe Foss, BUT……..leave Muslim Males alone lest we be
> guilty of profiling.
>
> Ask yourself, “Just how stupid are we?” Have the
> American people completely lost their minds or just their
> Power of Reason???
>
> Let’s send this to as many people as we can so that the
> Gloria Alred’s and other stupid attorneys; along with
> Federal Justices, that want to thwart common sense, feel
> ashamed of themselves — if they have any such sense.
>
> As the writer of the award winning story “Forrest Gump
> ” so aptly put it, “Stupid Is as Stupid
> Does.”
>
> Each opportunity that you have to send this to a friend or
> media outlet…
>
> Do It!
>
> OR JUST SIT BACK, KEEP GRIPING, AND DO NOTHING. AS OBAMA
> SAID IN HIS BOOK “NOTHING SOUNDS AS BEAUTIFUL AS THE
> MUSLIM EVENING PRAYERS FROM THE TOWER.” Klink A.D.
>
> >

We need him

trump-elite

America’s intellectual conservatives and liberals may not agree on various issues of policy, but there is one thing that unites them: More often than not, they are both blind to the realities of what it’s like to actually live and work in the United States. They shut themselves up in the Washington upper-class clubs and the tonier areas of New York City, completely oblivious to the truth of today’s middle class.

It is for this reason that they are continually shocked and dismayed by the rise of Republican nominee Donald Trump. They can’t stand his crude remarks, his disdain for political correctness, or his revolutionary approach to issues like global trade and immigration. Trump’s policies didn’t come from a think-tank. They didn’t come from this month’s issue of National Review. They don’t sound much like anything we’ve heard from mainstream Republicans for the last quarter-century.

That terrifies and disgusts the pundit class, just as it electrifies and inspires voters outside of that bubble. For years, these elitists have been telling us how good these trade policies are for the U.S., deliberately choosing to ignore the effects they’ve had on millions of working-class Americans. For years, they’ve been celebrating the “diversity” of immigration, while turning a blind eye to the stagnant wages and entry-level unemployment rates that have plagued middle America.

When it comes to foreign policy, the difference between liberal and conservative elitists is even more difficult to pinpoint. Each slams the other side for various things…before going on to propose policies that are hardly different. Save a few, each of the Republicans running for the nomination this year harshly criticized Obama’s war on ISIS, but their own proposed strategies sounded as though they could have come straight out of his administration.

Trump has spent a lot of time hammering Washington’s subservience to special interests – and that’s important – but the biggest problem may be the subservience to the status quo. No one is brave enough to actually think outside the box, and that’s why things seem to get worse and worse, no matter which party happens to occupy the White House.

The time has come to pursue a new path. Trump may not be able to rattle off a dozen rehearsed, overly-complex soundbites that make it sound like he’s an expert on everything, but he’s not afraid to break from decades of clearly-broken policy. That gets under the skin of elitists, but it’s exactly what our country needs right now.

My Thoughts

 

 

Wake Up People

Franklin Graham


Subject:
 The American dream 

Time is like a river. You cannot touch the same water twice, because the
flow that has passed will never pass again.

Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, was speaking at the First
Baptist Church in Jacksonville ,
Florida in January, 2015, when he said
America will not come back. He wrote:

The American dream ended on November 6th, 2012 in Ohio . The second
term of Barack Obama has been the final nail in the coffin for the
legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored,
pioneered, settled and developed the greatest republic in the history
of mankind. A coalition of blacks, Latinos, feminists, gays,
government workers, union members, environmental extremists, the
media, Hollywood , uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the
chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers”
have ended Norman Rockwell’s America .

You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual
acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get
back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take
zealots, not moderates and shy, not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to
right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status.
People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will
probably never again be able to legally comment on or concern myself
with the aforementioned coalition which has surrendered our culture,
our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.

The cocker spaniel is off the front porch, the pit bull is in the back
yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky’s
“Rules for Radicals.” The likes of Chicago shyster David Axelrod
along with international socialist George Soros have been pulling the
strings on their beige puppet and brought us Act 2 of the New World
Order. The curtain will come down but the damage has been done, the
story has been told.

Those who come after us will once again have to risk their lives,
their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that
this generation has timidly frittered away due to white guilt and
political correctness…

This was sent in my email today. Thought I would share it.

My Thoughts